Modularity lifting beyond the Taylor–Wiles method

Modularity Lifting beyond the Taylor–wiles Method

We prove new modularity lifting theorems for p-adic Galois representations in situations where the methods of Wiles and Taylor–Wiles do not apply. Previous generalizations of these methods have been restricted to situations where the automorphic forms in question contribute to a single degree of cohomology. In practice, this imposes several restrictions – one must be in a Shimura variety settin...

Modularity Lifting beyond the Taylor–wiles Method. Ii

Non-minimal Modularity Lifting in Weight One

We prove an integral R = T theorem for odd two dimensional p-adic representations of GQ which are unramified at p, extending results of [CG] to the non-minimal case. We prove, for any p, the existence of Katz modular forms modulo p of weight one which do not lift to characteristic zero.

Modularity lifting theorems for ordinary Galois representations

We generalize the results of [CHT08] and [Tay08] by proving modularity lifting theorems for ordinary l-adic Galois representations of any dimension of a CM or totally real number field F . The main theorems are obtained by establishing an R = T theorem over a Hida family. A key part of the proof is to construct appropriate ordinary lifting rings at the primes dividing l and to determine their i...

How far beyond modularity?

of the original article: Beyond modularity attempts a synthesis of Fodor’s anticonstructivist nativism and Piaget’s antinativist constructivism. Contra Fodor, I argue that: (1) the study of cognitive development is essential to cognitive science, (2) the module/central processing dichotomy is too rigid, and (3) the mind does not begin with prespecified modules; rather, development involves a gr...